CRQs for the Final FRCA by Caroline Whymark PDF Free Download

An essential exam preparation workbook, CRQs for the Final FRCA is dedicated to helping candidates pass this new assessment type for the Final FRCA Written Paper first time.Focusing solely on the Constructed Response Question (CRQ), the book is organised into six practice papers each comprised of 12 CRQs, reflecting the real exam. Each question has been carefully laid out, clearly identifying the weighting of each part of the question and with appropriate space to write your answer.Covering a breadth of topics, the book represents the full spectrum of the Final FRCA curriculum. Appendices indicate which aspects of the curriculum and units of training have been addressed in each practice paper to help you structure your revision efficiently.Written by a team of consultant anaesthetists and active educators, detailed model answers are based on years of clinical experience, best practice guidelines, and supported by further reading and evidence base. Many acceptable answers are listed (more than the candidate is required to give), enriching your revision experience and ensuring that you can mark your answers accurately.This invaluable resource also includes advice on CRQ technique, making this the only guide candidates need to pass CRQs in the Final FRCA Written Paper.

User’s Review:

Editorial Reviews: About the Author Caroline Whymark, Consultant in Anaesthesia and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Crosshouse, NHS Ayrshire and Arran,Ross Junkin, Consultant in Anaesthesia, University Hospital Crosshouse, NHS Ayrshire and Arran,Judith Ramsey, Consultant in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Crosshouse, NHS Ayrshire and Arran –This text refers to an alternate kindle_edition edition.

Reviews from Amazon users which were colected at the time this book was published on the website:

Overall a good book with questions as per the new exam format. A useful revision resource with coverage of lots of useful and favourite exam topics.However, I’m inclined to agree with some of the other negative reviews, in particular re’ the ambiguity of certain questions as well as a number of mistakes e.g. MCA/ICA mislabled on the circle of Willis, incorrect explanation of the effect of crystalloids on the anion gap etc. I suppose the mistakes don’t matter provided you recognise them, otherwise they are potentially misleading.

Not all information current and latest version. Lots of questions ambiguous in their wording, making it difficult to know what was actually being asked. Diagrams inaccurate (eg circle of Willis). Disappointed in the quality compared to other books in the same series